| ▲ | soerxpso 2 days ago | |
> Ok, if that's really your thinking then you need to lay out: here's an impossible-to-ignore thing we can do with this, and this is how, and this is why this wouldn't be possible without this thing. There was a period of ~1000 years where you could also make this argument against some high-minded guy advocating for democracy. | ||
| ▲ | hashmap 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
It is both telling and very, very funny to confuse asking for specifics for making an argument against something. | ||