| ▲ | grayhatter 2 days ago | |
> What if it were ten different humans writing ten different-but-related pieces of code, and an eleventh human piecing them together? What if it were 1,000 different humans? What if it was just a single person? I take it you didn't read any of the code in the ocaml vibe pr that was posted a bit ago? The one where Claude copied non just implementation specifics, but even the copyright headers from a named, specific person. It's clear that you can have no idea if the magic black box is copying from a single source, or from many. So your comment boils down to; plagiarism is fine as long as I don't have to think about it. Are you really arguing that's ok? | ||
| ▲ | jacquesm 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
> So your comment boils down to; plagiarism is fine as long as I don't have to think about it. It is actually worse: plagiarism is fine if I'm shielded from such claims by using a digital mixer. When criminals use crypto tumblers to hide their involvement we tend to see that as proof of intent, not as absolution. LLMs are copyright tumblers. | ||