| ▲ | pjc50 3 days ago | |||||||
Am I right in thinking that the old PA-Semi team was bought by Apple, and are substantially responsible for the success of the M-series parts? | ||||||||
| ▲ | scrlk 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Acquiring P.A. Semi got them Dan Dobberpuhl and Jim Keller, which laid a good design foundation. However, IMO, I'd lean towards these as the decisive factors today: 1) Apple's financial firepower allowing them to book out SOTA process nodes 2) Apple being less cost-sensitive in their designs vs. Qualcomm or Intel. Since Apple sells devices, they can justify 'expensive' decisions like massive caches that require significantly more die area. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | classichasclass 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
P.A. Semi contributed greatly to Apple silicon, but the company has nothing to do with PA-RISC. In fact, their most notable chip before Apple bought them was Power ISA. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sgerenser 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
PA Semi (Palo Alto Semiconductor) had no relation to HP’s PA-RISC (Precision Architecture RISC). | ||||||||