No they won't. DoD is small compared to the rest of the software market. You get better quality and lower cost with COTS than with custom solutions, unless you spend a crap ton. The labor market for software's no different.

Everyone likes to crap on C++ because it's (a) popular and (b) tries to make everyone happy with a ton of different paradigms built-in. But you can program nearly any system with it more scalably than anything else.

▲

adrianN 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

In my experience people criticize C++ for its safety problems. Safety is more important in certain areas than in others. I’m not convinced that you get better quality with C++ than with Ada

▲

nmz 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Go was built because C++ does not scale. Anybody that's ever used a source based distro knows that if you're installing/building a large C++ codebase, better forget your PC for the day because you will not be using it. Rust also applies here, but at least multiplatform support is easier, so I don't fault it for slow build times

	▲	pjmlp a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Go was created because Rob Pike hates C++, notice Plan 9 and Inferno don't have C++ compilers, even though C++ was born on UNIX at Bell Labs. As for compilation times, yes that is an issue, they could have switched to Java as other Google departments were doing, with some JNI if needed. As sidenote, Kubernetes was started in Java and only switching to Go after some Go folks joined the team and advocated for the rewrite, see related FOSDEM talk.
	▲	lallysingh a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Go was made because Rob Pike didn't want to do Java.

▲

bmitc 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> more scalably than anything else

That's quite debatable. C++ is well known to scale poorly.