|
| ▲ | KellyCriterion 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| There was a great article in a German magazine some month ago, they are listing very detailled how cash tracking works and who is involved and which process step:
https://netzpolitik.org/2025/reise-eines-zwannis-diese-gerae... Its really interesting, feel free to use your favorite LLM to translate it :) |
|
| ▲ | pfortuny 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Point taken about anonymity. However, its design (that of cash) is theoretically anonymous, it is reality which gets in the way. BTC, on the other hand, is "just" a huge ledger of transactions with giver and receiver perfectly "identified" (in a unique way, albeit just pseudonymous) and preserved forever. Also, as you point out, BTC is a massive waste of resources and storage space. |
| |
| ▲ | copirate 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > giver and receiver perfectly "identified" (in a unique way, albeit just pseudonymous) Not perfectly. A lot of heuristics are needed to link a unique owner to multiple transactions. With bitcoin, it's recommended to use a new address for every transaction so, for example, in a basic transaction, it's not so easy to identify which output is the recipient and which is the change. And there's Monero that tries to hide these links a lot more. |
|
|
| ▲ | throw101010 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Which is why higher layers like the Lightning Network, Rootstock, Liquid offer to not store everything on chain and offer speed/features Bitcoin natively can't while resting on the higher security model of their base layer. |