| ▲ | toast0 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Electrifying ferries is great, but this particular one has a run time of 20 minutes (and a charge time of 10 minutes). I get a totally different vibe from 'oceanic ship' than a 20 minute ferry ride. Near me, we now have a hybrid ferry, no charging infrastructure, but it still uses much less fuel than before it was refit, so that's cool too. It's bigger than the one you linked and sails on a longer route: 2,499 passengers, 202 vehicles, typically serves an 8.6 mile route. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jacquesm 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Absolutely, but that's how this starts. Boats too started as ferries, it took many, many years before boats purposefully went into blue water. Ferries are a great testbed, they have lots of cycles and they are a pre-cursor to coastal and then eventually larger ocean going vessels, which I predict will go diesel-electric before they go all electric. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SideburnsOfDoom 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Electrifying ferries is great, but this particular one has a run time of 20 minutes (and a charge time of 10 minutes). And this one, under construction now, will have a run time of 90 minutes and charge time of 40 minutes: https://spectrum.ieee.org/electric-boat-battery-ship-ferry https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45844832 Sibling comment is perfectly correct that it starts small and ramps up. From that article: > "The ferry format, with its high-frequency turnaround, relatively short segment distances, and shore-based rapid charging, is one of the most promising early use cases for electrification in the maritime sector. Maritime electrification has gained momentum over the past few years" Early. Momentum. Moving some noticeable percentage of ships away from fossil fuels is still a win. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||