  > Why shouldn't I get my cut, then?

They do offer to pay you for it, which you'd know if you read the article.

▲ hk__2 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

OP obviously read the article; please don’t be aggressive.

▲ UncleEntity an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

So you pay $20/month to be able to earn some crypto-coins they generate out of thin air to be used for...

If they aren't paying the equivalent of whatever the government allows you to deduct for 'wear and tear' on your vehicle then you're basically just subsidizing their data collection.

I don't even have an opinion on this, you do you.

--edit--

Oh, I saw down thread they're primarily a fleet services company and that explains a bunch. $20/month per car probably makes sense if you're outfitting an entire fleet and integrate it with your wonky in-house drivers' app which is barely fit for purpose. Yeah, I'm not bitter...

▲

gavinray an hour ago | parent [-]

To phrase my point another way, an analogy might be:

Would you shout away a man who dug through your trash to pull out things he could sell?

You've already binned the trash. At that point, nothing that happens to it matters to you.

Either:

A) You lose nothing, and nobody gains something

B) You lose nothing, and somebody gains something

Picking A) is, from a philosophical viewpoint, essentially malice for the sake of it.

	▲	UncleEntity 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Like I said, you do you. All I really have an issue with is the claim you get compensated for the time and energy you, essentially, donate to the company. If that's what you want to do with your time then by all means... It just seems like a weird business model to me, they sell a pimped-out dash cam (fair enough) and pay some tokens (or rely on your philosophical bent) so you're willing to turn over all your data so they can repackage and sell it. To give credit where credit is due, they seem to be completely transparent with this and if the people who participate don't care then why should I?