| ▲ | oncallthrow 4 hours ago |
| I agree that mental health conditions probably are overdiagnosed and overdiagnosis of this kind is genuinely harmful in many cases (via nocebo effect). But equally I do think it's true that there really are more people with mental health conditions, largely because: * life is genuinely worse today than it was 20 years ago, mostly because of technology * the excessive amount of screen time that the average person experiences is fundamentally harmful to the natural balance of neurotransmitters in the brain |
|
| ▲ | sallveburrpi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I don’t think life is generally worse than 20 years ago. Sure some things are tougher and it depends on your class how much you feel the stress - but looking at most metrics like child mortality, literacy, starvation and people dying in armed conflicts those improved compared to 20 years ago. Sure for some there is a recent change (most notably war in Europe and genocide in Gaza) - but overall it’s still positive. That might not be true for the USA but overall it is. What I think is a big cause for my generation (gen-x) is that we were promised this “perfect” harmonious world beginning of the 90s/00s with all kinds of tech marvels and no more wars and oppression and freedom and abundance for everyone. Waking up to the reality of the human condition hasn’t been easy for that generation. |
| |
| ▲ | endorphine 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There are also other factors that are not easily quantifiable, even though they might be more important: deep connections with other humans, supportive local communities, finding meaning in something outside of yourself, feeling connected to your vocation etc. Byung-Chul Han would have a lot to say on this matter. I would argue that by those measures, we are worse than let's say 50y ago. | | |
| ▲ | sallveburrpi 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I wasn’t alive 50 years ago so I can’t really compare.
I would say however that not being dead, mutilated or starving is more important than deep connections with other humans. I do get your point that many people feel this has been eroded by social media and online culture. However it’s a tiny blip and I think in 5-10 years we will see the terminally online years (~2016-2030) as a weird period in history. Of course this is highly subjective and depends a lot on your age and where in the world you live as well… |
| |
| ▲ | inglor_cz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Materially, most places in the world are better off than 20 years ago, or at least haven't worsened. But emotionally, people now inhabit virtual places full of relentless negativity. That is the problem. | | |
| ▲ | sallveburrpi 30 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I agree that it’s a problem but it’s largely self-inflicted — you can just turn of the screen and go outside at any time. It may sound strange but it’s that easy |
| |
| ▲ | gambiting 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The "problem" is that it's all comparative, even if in absolute terms you are right - life is undeniably better than it used to be by every metric. But to give you an example - my grandma had 8 siblings, out of which only 4 survived into adulthood. They mostly died before even turning 1, the typical "one day he was fine, the next day he turned purple and died, the nearest doctor was 2 hours away if your neighbour let you borrow a horse cart, so that's just what it was" case. Her father and her uncle were taken into Auschwitz and miraculously returned but never wanted to talk about the horrors they have seen while there. For the rest of her life she endured living under communism, seeing her peers in other countries have access to riches she could only dream of. So now when you talk to her, how can you blame her for thinking that kids nowadays are spoiled, if they have everything provided for them, they have never experienced physical violence of any kind, but they are all depressed and sad about life being shit and saying how it was better in the good old days. Like, from her perspective, it's impossible to understand. But also, from the kids perspectives nowadays, all they know is a world where the "old" people have houses, jobs, stable incomes, and they cannot even hope for any of it. 50 year mortgages, 700 job applications with no interview, social media blasting images of a life that they know they can't ever have.....of course they are depressed. Just showing them stats that say "you live better, comfier, safer andd healthier lives than pretty much anyone else ever in the history of humanity" is not going to help if all they know is how much "worse" they have it than the people who came before them. | | |
| ▲ | senfiaj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think what definitely has improved, is the survival. We are less likely to starve, die in infancy / childhood, have longer life expectancy, etc. In the past there were also stresses. But I think the stresses were different then. They were less chronic and were more occasional instead (although probably more intense). However, after an acute stress you had a lot of time to recover. Evolutionary speaking, our brains have been adapted for that. It was necessary for our survival. However, nowadays the stresses are different, they are more chronic / frequent. You have less time to recover from them. This is partially the result of our more complex and fast paced society / economy. Our brains are not well adapted for the modern work / educational environments and to the stresses associated with them, despite they are usually milder in intensity. Today's stress is more like to death by a thousand small cuts. Nowadays people have more anxiety, depression and suicidality. Here is a good video that talks about the modern stress: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo1A45ShcMo . | |
| ▲ | frankc 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I actually think the social media factor is the biggest reason...we can now compare ourselves to a much, much large circle which makes our relative standing seem much worse. I think relative standing affects our happiness much more than absolute. From a mate competition standpoint, that actually makes logical sense. | | |
| ▲ | sallveburrpi 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Participating in social media is a choice.
I get that it’s an unpopular opinion it you can really keep it to a minimum and still interact with people.
Of course I’m not a teenager anymore so it might be more pressure for them. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | qeternity 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > life is genuinely worse today than it was 20 years ago, mostly because of technology Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Almost everything today in absolute terms is better than 20 years ago, even more so outside the developed world. What specifically today is worse than 20 years ago? |
| |
| ▲ | onionisafruit 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I’m 20 years older than I was in 2005. My kids moved out of state, and I barely get to see them. My hip hurts most of the time. Of course I’m joking, but people do generally look back fondly on their youth. I think that’s a big reason for the perception that everything is awful now compared to the recent past. | |
| ▲ | techblueberry 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To quote one of my favorite movies: “In prison I learned that everything in this world, including money, operates not on reality... but the perception of reality” We are much more constantly aware of the chaos of our world through social media. And in regards to mental illness, perception is reality. That and of course, housing prices. Jebus, 20 years ago I paid $400 per month for a studio apartment in the downtown of a major city. I do find this an interesting retort though. I would argue that if a few numbers go one way, and broad sentiment goes another way, things _have_ gotten worse. Like this whole argument on “life’s gotten worse” is inherently subjective so subjective measures have more validity. | |
| ▲ | keiferski 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Housing costs, social life (2005 is pre-iPhone), the value of an education, future outlook for careers/jobs, the mere existence of certain jobs pre-AI (i.e. writing), political polarization, to name a few off the top of my head. | |
| ▲ | clanky 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | To take the example of a minor little necessity like shelter, housing affordability is far worse today than it was 20 years ago, despite the fact that we were near the peak of a huge credit-driven housing bubble at that time. |
|
|
| ▲ | turnsout 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Throughout time, people have complained that technology is ruining the world. Before AI it was the internet, and before that it was TV, nuclear power, and so on. The quoted GP in the headline is correct. Life is just stressful. Previous generations understood this more, but my peers (Millennials) have an annoying tendency to complain that things are worse now than they ever have been, and their ADHD/anxiety is related to how "the world is now." It's BS. And it robs them of agency. Constant "happiness" should not be the goal, and the successful people Millennials admire are all living with stress and anxiety. It is normal. |
| |
| ▲ | sailingparrot 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Throughout time, people have complained that technology is ruining the world. Before AI it was the internet, and before that it was TV, nuclear power, and so on. What if throughout time they have been right ? Any proof thst while tech brought longer lifes and more material wealth, we haven’t just spiraled down for a while in term of mental wellbeing, sense of meaning, sense of belonging etc ? That’s obviously not true of every piece of tech (I.e. it’s hard to imagine how antibiotics or replacing a coal plant by a nuclear power plant could have negative impact of people’s mental wellbeing) but it could be true about technology in general. It’s not a stretch to believe that technologies that radically transform what a day in the life of a human being looks like, can also have an impact on said human beings life. Our bodies and mind, have been finetuned for living in nature and hunting gathering, with a small group consisting of our families and friends for millions of years. Now we live a sedentary life, for many away from family and without any sense of community, in large, noisy, devoid of nature cities having to do day in day out the same job that is more and more compartimentalized and less and less concrete and meaningful, only to go home and sit in front of a tv to be bombarded by ads trying to induce fomo, or god forbid, doom scrolling on tik tok for hours. If it just so happened that those two modes of life generate the exact same levels and qualities of stress in our little brains, that would be quite the coincidence. Look at every stat around mental health: anxiety, depression, sense of meaning etc. They are all getting worse over decades. And if you think it’s caused by people just complaining more than before, look at how the rate of people willing to kill themselves, that’s the ultimate truth. All worsening. | | |
| ▲ | turnsout 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you continue this argument ad infinitum, you'll eventually conclude that agriculture was our first mistake, and we should have just stayed in the cave. Like, how is this line of reasoning constructive? I guarantee our hunter-gatherer ancestors felt all the same emotions—burnout, comparison, envy, anxiety, stress, overwhelm, hopelessness. The setting has changed, but our brains have not changed that much. | | |
| ▲ | sailingparrot an hour ago | parent [-] | | > I guarantee our hunter-gatherer ancestors felt all the same emotions—burnout, comparison, envy, anxiety, stress, overwhelm, hopelessness. Yes they felt all the same emotions. You absolutely cannot guarantee they felt them in the same proportions thought. > our brains have not changed that much. That is the point: our brains have not changed and is still evolving at the speed of gene mutations. Our environment though is changing magnitudes faster than before. > how is this line of reasoning constructive? This is not trying to be constructive, just trying to understand the human condition. We probably have no choice but to learn to deal with it, that doesn’t mean technology has no adverse impact. | | |
| ▲ | turnsout 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Friend, hunter-gatherers felt more existential dread than you do, because 50% of their kids died, and they themselves would be lucky to live to the ripe old age of 40. Every generation in history has felt that things used to be better and they got the short end of the stick. My grandparents lived through the Great Depression and World War II. My parents lived through the cold war, Watergate and Vietnam. Millennials have phones that they like too much, and it's slightly harder to buy a house, and they feel like no one has ever endured this much hardship. We need to grow up. "Too much Instagram" is not remotely on the same level as "we need to hide in the basement during air raids." PS, I don't buy any argument that there's more depression now than there was at an earlier point in history, because psychology does not have the most stellar track record when it comes to scientific rigor. I just don't trust any measure that's over 20 years old. |
|
|
|
|