| ▲ | ACCount37 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This kind of thing is really held back by BCI tech. By now, we have smartphones with camera systems that beat human eyes, and SoCs powerful enough to perform whatever image processing you want them to, in real time. But our best neural interfaces have the throughput close to that of a dial-up modem, and questionable longevity. Other technological blockers advanced in leaps and bounds, but SOTA on BCI today is not that far away from 20 years ago. Because medicine is where innovation goes to die. It's why I'm excited for the new generation of BCIs like Neuralink. For now, they're mostly replicating the old capabilities, but with better fundamentals. But once the fundamentals - interface longevity, ease of installation, ease of adaptation - are there? We might actually get more capable, more scalable BCIs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SiempreViernes 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Because medicine is where "move fast and break things" means people immediately die. Fixed the typo for you. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | arcanemachiner 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
To anyone wondering: BCI == Brain-computer interface | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||