Sure, but that depends on the thing actually being illegal first. Genuine question - how often in practice are terms and conditions successfully challenged? My thought is that companies like that would be able to drain plaintiffs out before it getting that far very often

▲

hn8726 5 hours ago | parent [-]

And how often in practice are terms and conditions attempted to be enforced in the first place? No need to challenge them if you can ignore them

	▲	ImPostingOnHN an hour ago \| parent [-]
		If ignoring them is your only option, and challenging them would fail, we would expect to see a lack of challenging them. Which we do. Unless there's a solid track record of people consistently challenging them and winning, we can assume, based on bayesian priors, that most people cannot. Which makes sense: court costs money.