|
| ▲ | slg an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| It is always enlightening when people criticizing "virtue signaling" accidentally reveal that the problem they have is not the signaling, it's the having virtue. |
| |
| ▲ | msandford an hour ago | parent [-] | | There was a time when one of the virtues was not to brag about how virtuous you were. I think that's why a lot of folks have a problem with virtue signalling. In their minds if you're signalling by doing something publicly it karmically negates what you're doing and almost alchemically turns it into something resembling vice. I'm merely trying to explain how it is that people can have a problem with virtue signalling and to them it doesn't really contradict what is to them true virtue where you do something good and stay quiet about it. | | |
| ▲ | slg 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This comment feels like it was made outside the context of the existing conversation. The comment I replied to was calling all charity virtue signaling and not just vocal giving. But either way, I personally don’t think a library is any less valuable to a community just because it has Carnegie’s name above the entrance. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | afavour 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you choose to classify all charity donations as "virtue signaling", yes. If you reject that absurd false framing, no. |
|
| ▲ | array_key_first an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's not virtue signally if you're tangible helping people. Like if I give away food, maybe I have the intent of signalling something, but I'm also giving away food. That actually happened. The world would be a much better place if rich people virtue signalled much more and thereby donated more. |
