| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> Assume you're right: VAERS is useless for causality… Don't assume. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html "When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established." > What possible benefits does RFK Jr. get from dramatically restricting a vaccine using data he knows is meaningless and will be shredded in 24 hours by every fact-checker and cardiologist on HN/Twitter/younameit? He gets to restrict vaccines, which is a thing he's wanted to do for decades. (And not just COVID ones; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-acip-vaccine-panel-hepatiti... happened this morning. Or the spurious claims about Tylenol and autism.) What about this administration makes you think they care about having their false claims "shredded in 24 hours"? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | andreygrehov 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Duh. VAERS guide says raw reports dont 100% prove causality. Nobody claims they do. That's why FDA's OBPV did the follow-up review of those 96 child deaths and concluded >10 were causal from vaccine myocarditis. They could've just said "VAERS proves nothing" and left the recommendation unchanged. Instead they wrote it up, leaked it early, and invited the exact scrutiny you're giving it now. If the conclusion was fake or flimsy, this blows up in their face and RFK looks like a clown. They only take that risk if the OBPV analysis actually held up internally. Edit: as for the Tylenol, see this https://x.com/HHSGov/status/1970868168995536978 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||