They define unvaccinated as anyone in the study who didn't get their first dose by Nov 2021. That feels like a pretty tight window to me. I don't think they checked to see if those "unvaccinated" people got vaccinated during the 4 year followup, especially given the mandates that forced people to get them.

▲

ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's a year into its availability in France. Anyone who didn't have their first dose by then probably wasn't getting a dose.

You can see that in this chart (click the 5Y range): https://ycharts.com/indicators/france_coronavirus_full_vacci...

It's the full vaccination rate; as of Dec 1 2021 it was 69.89%. A month later (i.e. those Nov folks are getting their second dose) it's 74%; latest number on the chart is 78.44%.

▲

rob_c 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> That's a year into its availability in France. Anyone who didn't have their first dose by then probably wasn't getting a dose.

You are aware of the "incentives" offered by the French govt?

Such wonderful options as the ability to go the shops without being arrested that came with, "take the mandated medicine".

	▲	ceejayoz 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's entirely irrelevant to "what date do we pick as the cutoff for this research?" From the chart, they picked a very reasonable spot to draw said line.

▲

triceratops an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How would they calculate 4 year all-cause mortality on people who got vaccinated after Nov 2021? In case you haven't looked at a calendar recently, it's December 2025 now.

▲

sixQuarks 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	anticorporate 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> I knew there would be BS like this in the study If you "know" that a study whose title you are predisposed to disagree with has "BS" in it, something tells me no amount of scientific evidence is going to persuade you.