The comments in this thread make it abundantly clear there's nothing new about the right. Seed sharing predates your "TIL" knowledge of it.

▲

sejje 5 hours ago | parent [-]

There's nothing new about the practice. It becoming a human right would certainly be new.

That's like saying backhanding your kid is a human right. Every human on the planet practiced it forever.

▲

red-iron-pine 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

^ this is an attempt to derail an argument by making about a social justice issue

parent poster may be just some random goober, but this exact type of rebuttal, and about triggering items like domestic violence, is shillllllbot behavior

▲

oregano 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲

knollimar 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Their point is doing a thing for a long time doesn't enshrine it as a right.

The comment before could have said "should be a human right".

imo it's very frustrating having people say "thing I want is a right". What gives them that right? Are all laws not violation of rights if you extend that

	▲	biophysboy an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		All rights now encoded in law were originally moral claims.
	▲	overfeed 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		They are completely ignoring the context of this whole thread, which exists because the highest court in the land (Kenyan land, that is) has affirmed that right. Ggp's is as absurd as a North Korean commenting on a SCOTUS ruling on the right to a fair trial by saying "This is a new human right I didn't even know I had."