| ▲ | skeeter2020 6 hours ago |
| Netflix has always had one or three stand-out projects over a year, but is that what we want from studios? It is like the tech model: 1 big success for 10+ duds (the VC show) or another superhero installment (the Google/Meta cash cow movie). |
|
| ▲ | sbarre 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You're describing TV and movies since forever. Ever year there are a few good shows and movies and a lot of mid-to-bad shows and movies. This is not a Netflix thing, nor is it new. |
| |
|
| ▲ | jimbokun 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| By the definition of "stand out" you can't have very many right? If all of them "stand out" then none of them do. |
|
| ▲ | nebula8804 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If WB was any good, would they have been snatched up by Netflix? All these studios fought the good fight against big tech over many years but the writing was on the wall. Hopefully a future Progressive presidency reviews all these mergers and breaks up big tech big time. |
| |
| ▲ | Arkhaine_kupo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > If WB was any good, would they have been snatched up by Netflix? Yes because the situation of WB has nothing to do with their performance. In 1990s they merged with TIME publishing right before the internet killed all magazines. In 2000s with AOL right before th dot com bubble. In 2010s with AT&T who realised they needed a shit ton of money to roll out 5G so they took a massive loan and charged it to Warner debt. So WARNER keeps performing and the business side keeps adding debt from horrible decisions | | |
| ▲ | kovezd 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Lol so this means Netflix/streaming is the next trend going down? |
| |
| ▲ | Mindwipe 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Honestly Warner would have been fine if they hadn't been saddled with the debt that AT&T used to buy them. It wasn't an issue of Warner's business performance. | | |
| ▲ | truelson 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | AT&T was able offload a bunch of debt on to them, and cash out at about what they paid in 2016. Not shabby. | |
| ▲ | cap11235 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | At this point why would you consider WB as an entity at all. Thry were just another IP bundle |
|
|
