This is a good reminder for everyone to reconsider making all of their websites depend on a single centralized point of failure. There are many alternatives to the different services which Cloudflare offers.

▲ berkes 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But the nature of a CDN and most other products CF offers, is central by nature.

If you switch from CF to the next CF competitor, you've not improved this dependency.

The alternative here, is complex or even non-existing. Complex would be some system that allows you to hotswap a CDN, or to have fallback DDOS protection services, or to build you own in-house. Which, IMO, is the worst to do if your business is elsewhere. If you sell, say, petfood online, the dependency-risk that comes with a vendor like CF, quite certainly is less than the investment needed- and risk associted with- building a DDOS protection or CDN on your own; all investment that's not directed to selling more pet-food or get higher margins at doing so.

▲

altmanaltman 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

yeah there is no incentive to do a CDN in house, esp for businesses that are not tech-oriented. And the costs of the occasional outage has not really been higher than the cost of doing it in-house. And I'm sure other CDNs gets outages as well, just CF is so huge everyone gets to know about it and it makes the news

▲

agnivade an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

You can load-balance between CDN vendors as well

	▲	otikik an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Then your load balancer becomes the single point of failure.
	▲	sofixa 43 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		With what? The only (sensible) way is DNS, but then your DNS provider is your SPOF. Amazon used to run 2 DNS providers (separate NS from 2 vendors for all of AWS), but when one failed, there was still a massive outage.

▲ coffeebeqn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We just love to merge the internet into single points of failure

	▲	phatfish an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is just how free markets work, on the internet with no "physical" limitations it is simply accelerated. Left alone corporations to rival governments emerge, which are completely unaccountable. At least there is some accountability of governments to the people, depending on your flavour of government.
	▲	mschuster91 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		no one loves the need for CDNs other than maybe video streaming services. the problem is, below a certain scale you can't operate anything on the internet these days without hiding behind a WAF/CDN combo... with the cut-off mark being "we can afford a 24/7 ops team". even if you run a small niche forum no one cares about, all it takes is one disgruntled donghead that you ban to ruin the fun - ddos attacks are cheap and easy to get these days. and on top of that comes the shodan skiddie crowd. some 0day pops up, chances are high someone WILL try it out in less than 60 minutes. hell, look into any web server log, the amount of blind guessing attacks (e.g. /wp-admin/..., /system/login, /user/login) or path traversal attempts is insane. CDN/WAFs are a natural and inevitable outcome of our governments and regulatory agencies not giving a shit about internet security and punishing bad actors.

▲ inferiorhuman 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

  There are many alternatives

Of varying quality depending on the service. Most of the anti-bot/catpcha crap seems to be equivalently obnoxious, but the handful of sites that use PerimeterX… I've basically sworn off DigiKey as a vendor since I keep getting their bullshit "press and hold" nonsense even while logged in.

I don't like that we're trending towards a centralized internet, but that's where we are.

▲ koakuma-chan 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My Cloudflare Pages website works fine.