> Why does it matter if Netflix is using an open standard if every video they stream is wrapped in proprietary closed DRM?

I am not sure if this is a serious question, but I'll bite in case it is.

Without DRM Netflix's business would not exist. Nobody would license them any content if it was going to be streamed without a DRM.

>Without DRM Netflix's business would not exist. Nobody would license them any content if it was going to be streamed without a DRM.

I don't agree. If people refused to watch DRM-protected content, they would get rid of it.

For example, Pluto TV is a free streaming service that has much content without DRM. GOG lets you buy DRM-free games. Even Netflix itself lets you stream DRM-free content, albeit in low resolution.

Why? Everything gets pirated anyway, even with all the DRM. There’s no difference.

I don't think anybody could suggest going back to Blueray at this point, if selling online without DRM would be the only choice, they would have to comply.

I'm not convinced by that. If DRM didn't exist then do you really think studios would be like "nah we'll just miss out on all that money".

They just want DRM because it makes them even more money. Or at least they think it does. I have yet to find a single TV show or film that isn't available on Bittorrent so I don't think the DRM is actually preventing piracy in the slightest. I guess they want it in order to prevent legal tools from easily working with videos, e.g. for backup, retransmission etc.