This is interesting, but I found it moderately disturbing that they spend a LOT of effort up front talking about how they don’t have any access to the prompts or responses. And then they reveal that they did actually have access to the text and they spend 80% of the rest of the paper analyzing the content.

▲

charcircuit 9 hours ago | parent [-]

>And then they reveal that they did actually have access to the text

I'm not seeing that. All I'm seeing is them analyzing metadata.

▲

slack2450 4 hours ago | parent [-]

>All I'm seeing is them analyzing metadata Read the section about how they achieve classifications for prompts (hint: They read the prompts)

	▲	Argonaut998 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I didn’t read the paper but I know OR has an option to opt-in to reading/training off the prompts for a discount. Some free models also log, but I’m not sure if that is just the provider, or OR too