> Such an obviously unreasonable claim on a website called “Reason” makes me wonder what they are actually trying to achieve there.

Libertarianism, it would seem

▲

woodruffw an hour ago | parent [-]

> Libertarianism, it would seem

In some peculiar, perverted sense, given that evaluating claims of disability requires breaching students' medical privacy. You wouldn't normally expect libertarians to so overtly be okay with invasions of personal privacy.

▲

bee_rider an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I think they are just commenting on the bias of Reason magazine (it is a well known libertarian magazine).

	▲	woodruffw 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I know; I'm pointing out this is manifestly not a libertarian worldview. It's part and parcel with Reason being ideologically paleoconservative with a libertarian dressing.

▲

dragonwriter an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

That’s probably because Reason’s libertarian goal is not to get claims of disability evaluated. The goal is to get the government mandate for disability accommodations eliminated, which eliminates any benefit of making the claims and therefore any reason to evaluate the claims.