| ▲ | cardanome 7 hours ago |
| TS trademark is owned by Microsoft. That would be a case of out of the frying pan into the fire. Not really better. |
|
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Call it ES2026 officially and let other people devalue MS' trademark as they refer to that (and later versions) as TS. |
| |
| ▲ | bayindirh 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | ...and we'll have another API warfa^H^H^H^H lawsuit that we had for Java. | | |
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wasn't that a copyright issue? I thought the point of contention is that Google allegedly copied Oracle's API design when they re-wrote Java for Android. | | |
| ▲ | bayindirh 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wouldn't Microsoft do the same thing when somebody copies the language and names it "TypedWebBrowserScriptbutFree"? | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | walthamstow 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Same as Go and Google then. Is the ownership of the trademark of the name/logo of a FOSS language really that big a deal? |
| |
| ▲ | mdasen 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's the entire issue here: JS is a FOSS language and they don't like that Oracle owns the trademark. | | |
|