The example is indeed two years old. I also couldn't find any point in the article that explains why this is worth doing.

But it's a valid example, isn't it?

Someone just wanted to share their Rust + JavaScript knowledge with people, and they got a cease and desist. It's clearly not ideal.

	▲	tantalor 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Given they did not change the name, it suggests the legal challenge had failed. So why do we care?