I know just enough about Kubernetes to not sound like an idiot when I’m in the room and mostly I deploy Docker containers to various managed services on AWS - Lambda, ECS, etc.

But, as a lead for implementations, I just couldn’t in good conscience permit something that is not an industry standard and not supported by my cloud provider. First from a self interested standpoint, it looks a lot better on their resume to say “I did $x using K8s”.

From an onboarding standpoint, just telling a new employee “we use K8s -here you go” means nothing new to learn.

If you are part of the industry, just suck it up and learn Kubernetes. Your future self won’t regret it - coming from someone who in fact has not learn K8s.

This is a challenge any new framework is going to have.

▲

codegeek 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

With your logic, we will never have any new innovations being tried. This is a Show HN for a product someone built. No one is asking every corporation/company to replace K8s with this. It is a different and simpler take on the complexity of deploying containers without a control plane. I personally welcome these types of post. A lot of great products started out with someone just trying to solve their own problem.

	▲	raw_anon_1111 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In another reply, I commended him on doing it if the reasoning was “because he felt like the world needed it” or if it was to scratch an itch. But if he wants to make this a business - that’s a different beast with different challenges that he needs to address. I can’t find it now, but I could swear I saw somewhere he said he’s working on this full time and living off of savings. If I’m wrong he will correct me I am sure. If that’s the case, I assume he wants to make this a business. He has to think about those objection. Would he better off by first creating a known Kubernetes environment and then building an easier wrapper around that so someone could manage the K8s cluster in case they don’t want a dependency only on his product? I don’t have those answers

▲

psviderski 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Fair points on the career and onboarding angle. It’s hard to argue against "everyone knows it". But with that mentality, we'd never challenge anything. COBOL was the industry standard once. So were bare metal servers or fat VMs without containers. Someone had to say "this is more painful than it needs to be and I want to try something different because I can".

I know how to use k8s but I really don't enjoy it. It feels so distasteful to me that it triggered me to make an attempt at designing a nicer experience, because why not. I remember how much fun I had trying Docker when it first came out. That inspires me to at least try. It doesn't seem like the k8s community is even trying unfortunately.

	▲	raw_anon_1111 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The enterprise equivalent of COBOL today is Java and to a much lesser extent C#. Those were both championed by large corporations - Sun and Microsoft. The move to VMs at first and then to the cloud were also marketed by existing companies with huge budgets where people who made decisions had the “No one ever got fired for choosing $LargeWellknownCompany that is in the upper right corner of Gartner’s Magic Square”. I love Docker. I think everyone going to EKS before they need to is dumb. There are dozens of services out there that let you give it a Docker container and just run it. And I think that spending energy avoiding “cloud lock-in” is dumb. Choose your infrastructure and build. Migrations are going to be a pain at any decent scale anyway and you are optimizing for the wrong thing if you are worried about lock in. As an individual especially in today’s market, it’s foolish (not referring to you - any developer or adjacent) not to always be thinking of what keeps you the most employable if the rug gets pulled from under you. As a decision maker who is held accountable for architecture and when things go wrong they look at or when the next person has to come along to maintain it, they are going to look at me like I am crazy if I choose a non industry standard solution just because I was too lazy to choose the industry standard. Again I don’t mean that you are being “lazy”. That’s how people think. But if I were hiring someone - and I’m often interviewing people for cloudy/devOps type roles. Why would I hire someone with experience with a Docker orchestration framework I never heard of over someone who knew K8s? And the final question you should ask yourself is why are you really doing this? Is it to scratch an itch out of passion and it’s something that you feel the world should have? If so in all sincerity, I wish you luck on your endeavor. You might get lucky like Bun just did. I had effusive praise for them doing something out of passion instead of as VC bait. Are you doing it for financial gain? If so, you have to come up with a strategy to overcome resistance from people like Ive outlined.