Hmm single user website run as HTML from some folder? I guess you could embed this from s3 for multiple users but probably this would be like running multiple engines from the same dir.

▲

ekjhgkejhgk 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> Hmm single user website run as HTML from some folder?

Why not just sqlite then?

	▲	somat 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Postgres features are much nicer, honestly if you are using any sort of orm none of this matters. by design they isolate you from many of the more interesting features of the database. And in general this is probably a good thing. But if you enjoy hand writing artisanal sql postgres is far more pleasant to use than sqlite, not that sqlite is bad, it is very good, just... thin after using pg.
	▲	vincnetas 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		More SQL functionality?