There should already be a single priority for a company...

Why is the bar so low for the billionaire magnate fuck ups? Might as well implement workplace democracy and be done with it, it can't be any worse for the company and at least the workers understand what needs to be done.

▲

dymk 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You think a company the size of OAI should have a single priority? That makes no sense, that’s putting all their eggs on one basket.

▲

rovr138 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

All their services depend on their models. Their main priority should be that. If they're too thin, it gets affected.

What can openai do that, even if their models lag behind, will let them keep their competitive advantage?

	▲	pryce 7 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> What can openai do that, even if their models lag behind, will let them keep their competitive advantage? Regulatory capture. It's worth noting that an enormous amount of time and energy has already been allocated in this exact direction.
	▲	sothatsit 15 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		There are many reasons: 1. ChatGPT has a better UX than competitors. 2. Some people have become very tied to the memory ChatGPT has of them. 3. Inertia is powerful. They just have to stay close enough to competitors to retain people, even if they aren’t “winning” at a given point in time. 4. The harness for their models is also incredibly important. A big reason I continue to use Claude Code is that the tooling is so much better than Codex. Similarly, nothing comes close to ChatGPT when it comes to search (maybe other deep research offerings might, but they’re much slower). These are all pretty powerful ways that ChatGPT gets new users and retains them beyond just having the best models.