| ▲ | agentultra 8 hours ago | |||||||||||||
We haven’t passed the stage where we convince policy makers to stop dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. We’re not going to convince anyone to keep hiring software developers. I think we ought to be keeping people trained and employed but it seems we’re not on the winning side here. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
We gotta gather ourselves and remind companies why they once paid handsomely to not let potential disruptiors run rampant on the market. Long term new teams will form once productivity is valued again and not this giant incestuous GDP-maxmizing scheme. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dtech 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> I think we ought to be keeping people trained and employed I never understood this sentiment. We don't have a massive manual weaving industry anymore, 95%+ of people used to be farmers in 1900. Tech comes and replaces humans, and the transition can be extremely painful especially for the people replaced, but ultimately it's better than keeping people artificially employed in obsolete jobs. (I don't think SWE will be obsolete, but even in this case I'd rather switch careers) | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kortilla 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
The comparison to greenhouse gases doesn’t make sense. Corps pay a lot for developers right now because they get more value out of them than they cost. As long as that remains true, devs will be fine. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||