| ▲ | stingraycharles an hour ago |
| It’s not the fact that it exists nor is written by AIs, it’s the intent that it should promote Musk’s personal (political) biases instead of seeking out the truth. |
|
| ▲ | mbirth an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Do you have any evidence that Grokipedia is actually biased? Most articles are merely their Wikipedia counterpart filtered through the Grok LLM. |
| |
|
| ▲ | binary132 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| unlike the eminently objective and unbiased Wikipedia |
| |
| ▲ | LexiMax 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Conservapedia already exists if you care about the politics involved. Grokipedia is just a lazy low-effort vanity project of an unlikable billionaire. And that's a sentiment I've seen from conservatives and liberals. EDIT: I think it's worth mentioning that tech oligarchs once pretended to be progressive because it was the "in" thing to do. They are now pretending to be conservative because it's the "in" thing to do. But the truth is that they have no real morals and only believe in their own wealth and power. Even if you think their politics align with yours, it is only a temporary convenience, they will discard you as sure as they discarded liberals. |
|
|
| ▲ | refurb an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How so? Musk isn’t writing the articles, Grok is. And as far as I’ve seen, Grok doesn’t spit out information all that different from the other LLMs. |
| |
| ▲ | LexiMax 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Musk isn’t writing the articles, Grok is. The AI is necessarily biased based on what it's trained on, and the prompt it uses. Most of the time, there is a plausible deniability at play, which is what tech oligarchs rely upon to shape your world. Thankfully in the case of Grok, we know for a material fact that it uses a biased prompt because Twitter users have tricked it into being repeated publicly. |
|