But is there any reason to not treat this as Wikipedia? As in, just suggest a correction?

>> I've been reading a lot of Don Delillo lately and so I wanted to see how Grokipedia page on him fares.

> But is there any reason to not treat this as Wikipedia? As in, just suggest a correction?

How? I see no "Edit" link on the article:

* https://grokipedia.com/page/Don_DeLillo

as compared to:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_DeLillo

There is no "Talk" page as well, so if your change is 'contentious', how is consensus reached between different view points? Also, how does one link to previous revisions of an article? Further, how to do diffs between different revisions (there is "Edit history")?

See all the heavily biased content on the Joe Biden and Donald Trump articles?

Why not start there? Try to see if you can contribute a more neutral voice.

My guess is that the tone of these articles we see now is only the beginning. This thing is only a month old.

Then this will become the source of truth in the LLMs.

I cannot believe they've gone so against the spirit of contributors and that there's no legal recourse to stop this.

Open source and open content didn't bare enough fangs. It shouldn't have allowed profit.

We build open source for big tech. They use it (Linux, Redis, Elasticsearch, Python, etc.) to profit, keep us from owning the machines and systems (AWS) that concentrate and mechanize that profit. They then corral our labor, lay off, and move jobs overseas.

They expand into every industry and inject massive amounts of money to destabilize the incumbents. We literally just watched them dismantle the entire US film industry in just three years and swallow it whole. Tech is picking the bones dry.

And now it's happening with the media we create too.

If the pendulum of power swings, we MUST dismantle these companies. And we can't be slow like Lina Khan. It must be fast and furious like Project 2025.

We also need to weaponize our open source licenses.