| ▲ | kosolam 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
As a small user I find it hard to find a use case where I’d want a bsd for some reason. I even installed ghostbsd in a vm to try it but it seemed very similar to linux so I didn’t understand what’s the upside? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ggm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A small thing, but the mechanistic approach to bundling packages into bigger meta state, is (in my personal opinion) better than the somewhat ad-hoc approach to both writing and including things in an apt/dpkg. If the product is python, thats what it is. there is no python-additonal-headers or python-dev or bundle-which-happens-to-be-python-but-how-would-you-know. There is python, and there are meta-ports which explicitly 'call' the python port. The most notable example being X11. Its sub-parts are all very rational. fonts are fonts. libs are libs. drm is drm. drivers are drivers. (yes, there is the port/pkg confusion. thats a bit annoying.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cerved 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ZFS and jails are two things FreeBSD does very well | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | assimpleaspossi 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You don't have to reinstall with every software upgrade. Reliability and long term uptime are the norm. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | loeg 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1990s nostalgia. | |||||||||||||||||||||||