| ▲ | gregsadetsky an hour ago | |
I don't know this world well (I know what llvm is) but - does anyone know why this was made as a fork vs. contributing to llvm? I suppose it's harder to contribute code to the real llvm..? Thanks | ||
| ▲ | jjmarr an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
LLVM has very high quality standards in my experience. Much higher than I've ever had even at work. It might be a challenge to get this upstreamed. LLVM is also very modular which makes it easy to maintain forks for a specific backend that don't touch core functionality. | ||
| ▲ | Sharlin an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Pretty sure that the prospects of successfully pitching the LLVM upstream to include a 6502 (or any 8/16-bit arch) backend are only slightly better than a snowball’s chances in hell. | ||