| ▲ | There is No Quintic Formula [video](youtube.com) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 points by DamnInteresting 3 hours ago | 11 comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | steppi 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vladimir Arnold famously taught a proof of the insolubility of the Quintic to Moscow Highschool students in the 1960s using a concrete, low-prerequisite approach. His lectures were turned into a book Abel’s Theorem in Problems and Solutions by V.B. Alekseev which is available online here: https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/abel.pdf. He doesn't consider Galois theory in full generality, but instead gives a more concrete topological/geometric treatment. For anyone who wants to get a good grip on the insolubility of the quintic, but feels overwhelmed by the abstraction of modern algebra, I think this would be a good place to start. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | susam an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I learnt this subject from the book Galois Theory, 5th ed. by Ian Stewart. Quoting from page 177: Theorem 15.10. The polynomial t⁵ - 6t + 3 over ℚ is not soluble by radicals. As you can see, this theorem occurs in Chapter 15. So it takes fourteen chapters before we reach here. It takes a fair amount of groundwork to reach the point where the insolubility of a specific quintic feels natural rather than mysterious. To achieve this result, the book takes us through a fascinating journey involving field extensions, field homomorphisms, impossibility proofs for ruler and compass constructions, the Galois correspondence, etc. For me, the impossibility proofs were the most interesting sections of the book. Before reading the book, I had no idea how one could even formalise questions about what is achievable with a ruler and compass, let alone prove impossibility. Chapter 7 explains this beautifully and the algebraic framework that makes those proofs possible is very elegant. By the time we reach the section about the insoluble quintic, two key results have been established: Corollary 14.8. The symmetric group S_n is not soluble for n ≥ 5. Theorem 15.8. Let f be a polynomial over a subfield K of ℂ. If f is soluble by radicals, then the Galois group of f over K is soluble. The final step is then quite neat. We show that the Galois group of f = t⁵ - 6t + 3 over ℚ is S₅. Corollary 14.8 tells us S₅ is not soluble. By the contrapositive of Theorem 15.8, f is not soluble by radicals. Obviously whatever I've written here compresses a huge volume of work into a short comment, so it cannot capture how fascinating this subject is and how all the pieces fit together. But I'll say that the book is absolutely wonderful and I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in the subject. The table of contents is available here if you want to take a look: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OjZ9EAAAQBAJ&pg=PT4 Two small warnings: The book contains a fair number of errors which can be confusing at times, though there are plenty of errata and clarifications available online. And unless you already have sufficient background in field homomorphisms and field extensions, it can take several months of your life before you reach the proof of the insoluble quintic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | logannyeMD 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2swap makes some fantastic videos, I'd recommend giving them a follow on YT if you enjoy math visualizations. They also seem to spend quite a bit of time on the audio for each upload | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pfdietz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is if one is allowed to use elliptic functions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cyberax 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ugh. This video is an AI hell with distractions and an awful background noise (sorry, it's not music). There is a much better video by a real human: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSHv9Elk1MU | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | addaon 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Without video: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||