| ▲ | thegaitlessgate 2 hours ago | |||||||
Fedora has been rock solid for a few years (minus Zoom + Nvidia), as my primary work OS. I'm always nervous to jump to an Arch-based distro as my daily driver, for fear of having to regularly fix issues. Is this a legitimate concern in 2025? Would my experience (especially with graphics) be improved on something like Cachy? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jaapz 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I have been running arch for about 5 years now, and I think there were about 3 or 4 instances where I'd have to do some manual intervention to fix an update, but those interventions were generally all fixable by commands posted on arch linux's blog (which, for some weird reason, the arch devs expect you to check every time you run `sudo pacman -Syu`) Arch devs know how much friction manual intervention updates cause, so they try to keep them to a minimum. Honestly, I've had more problems running windows than running arch. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | vbezhenar an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I'm using ordinary Arch for the last year and I didn't have a single issue. | ||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Is this a legitimate concern in 2025? I've used Arch Linux (always with a nvidia GPU no less!) since 2017 sometime, moved over to CachyOS just this year, and had no issues that weren't caused by myself in all this time. I initially moved away from Ubuntu at that time, as I got so tired of dist-upgrade breaking my system every single time I tried to upgrade, so figured I'll at least understand the breakages better when they happen with Arch. But I never got Arch to break something by itself, it always end up being my fault. | ||||||||