> shift the default in open source from “it’s free for anyone to use” to “please don’t use this if you’re evil”

Point the author makes is precisely that they don't want to do free software, and they'd like to convince you not to do free software

▲

smeej 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There are already so many ways (and reasons) not to do free or open source software. People who find them convincing are using them. People who don't generally are not.

It seems like the author of the post is just potentially having a change of mind from one side to the other, which barely even seems noteworthy.

	▲	O_H_E 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> There are already so many ways (and reasons) not to do free or open source software. People who find them convincing are using them. To be honest, I don't think the space between GPL/MIT and commercial closed source is explored enough. I'm aware there's a few examples of things in between, but they are not common knowledge and they don't satisfy everyone. It is not a space that is easy to search online for established wisdom and comparisons in.
	▲	handoflixue 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Basically every argument has been made before, but there's still 10,000 people a day who are just finding out about it for the first time (https://xkcd.com/1053/) Clearly this sparked enough discussion and upvotes to make it to the front page of Hacker News, so people found it valuable.