Open source is a gift you’re giving.

Companies take that gift and use it to provide a service for cheaper than it would otherwise be if they had to build it all themselves.

You are already benefiting from open source - but it is a tiny benefit and subtle and very indirect and very diffuse.

Licensing is thorny but it’s personal choice too.. would you use a project whose license is “use it for now unless or until I decide you’re evil at my discretion”.. probably not. Probably, someone else would get the users you have now, and the corresponding popularity.

It is a tough choice, but it’s a lovely and important thing you’re doing when you provide the gift of open source software.

I think I probably would use a project that had a license that said "you can use this for now, but if I later decide I don't want evil people to use it, you'll have to maintain your own fork based on the last version before I made that decision."

Isn't that kind of always the bargain we're making? We can use someone's work as long as they're willing to let us, but if they change the license, we might not be able to continue using it.

[flagged]