| ▲ | dylan604 an hour ago | |||||||
I'd expect to see this type of fee for non-citizens a lot more. The US is saying a $100 fee for non-citizens to enter national parks will start next year. For the Louvre, I'd be willing to give benefit of the doubt that it's a budgetary decision. For the US though with the current administration, there's always a bit of question if the budgetary reason isn't just a mask for the true intention | ||||||||
| ▲ | kccqzy an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Non-residents not non-citizens. See, the administration still cares about the green card holders and H1B workers, who can still visit the national parks at the lower price. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | nicbou an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This was pretty common in Central Asia, and I don't object. It keeps things affordable for locals and available for visitors. I don't mind paying for free museums in other countries, since I'm not subsidising them with my taxes. | ||||||||
| ▲ | philipwhiuk an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
For parks I expect the best approach is to charge for parking. Charging actual entry is tedious. | ||||||||