| ▲ | ruined 2 hours ago |
| um, it literally does |
|
| ▲ | jeremyjh 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I'm really curious whats going on here. Is this a joke? Are you ok? |
| |
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] | | It's a joke. | |
| ▲ | ruined 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | did you even read the article?? | | |
| ▲ | dundarious 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't appreciate these kinds of simple one-line referential jokes on HN, but your joke was to emulate perfectly the central issue of TFA, so I do agree that it brings into question who did and who did not read the article -- I know you read it. | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | nchmy 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | latexr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | E-mail the staff (link in the footer). Either dang or tomhow will reply, and they take these seriously and can take action. | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nchmy 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| no,it quite literally doesnt... |
| |
| ▲ | dundarious 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The central complaint of TFA is the exact same as what ruined is doing. It is very obviously a joke. Not something I appreciate on HN, but still. | | |
| ▲ | andy99 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it was a good enough joke or witty remark grounded in the crux of the article that it’s worth it. And it’s certainly interesting to see the “whoosh” past many of the commenters | | | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | ruined 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | a remarkable assertion from nchmy | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
