| ▲ | dotancohen 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interesting idea. It seems to me that most things which would need to be protected from hidden cameras would be stationary and not require the operator to mount the detectors on his body, but starting with mobile constraints is often helpful. I would like to draw attention to this gem of wit, easily the best I've seen in a long time: > I think the idea behind this approach is sound (actually it's light) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | october8140 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's me. I want to be protected from hidden cameras from other peoples glasses. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | arionmiles an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Isn't the biggest mobile use case where you don't want to be secretly recorded in public? This was a big concern with the original Google Glass. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anilakar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> most things which would need to be protected from hidden cameras would be stationary Counter-sniper systems that scan for reflections from optics have existed for twenty years already. These are indeed meant for static operation in military bases and other fixed installations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aqme28 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I could see these being worn by walking-around security in a place where filming by the audience isn’t allowed. Super cool. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | _ache_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I agree, I laugh out loud at that pun. | |||||||||||||||||||||||