| ▲ | vander_elst 4 hours ago | |
I understood what's going on in this article only after reading the paper. It's might be good to define things s bit better in the article or say that the paper is a prerequisite for reading the article | ||
| ▲ | avadodin an hour ago | parent [-] | |
The paper itself is an overview that doesn't discuss the cache-friendly optimizations in the original 1986 PhD thesis so it feels like a hash table all the way down. | ||