Given the importance of scale for this particular product, any company placing itself on "just" one layer of the whole story is at a heavy disadvantage, I guess. I'd rather have a winning google than openai or meta anyway.

▲

subroutine 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> I'd rather have a winning google than openai or meta anyway.

Why? To me, it seems better for the market, if the best models and the best hardware were not controlled by the same company.

	▲	jimbohn 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I agree, it would be the best of bad cases, in a sense. I have low trust in OpenAI due to its leadership, and in Meta, because, well, Meta has history, let's say.