> It's really hard to argue that LLM's don't have intelligence in the way the earthworms do.

It's really easy to argue, actually. LLMs have intelligence the way humans online do. An earthworm is highly specialized for what it does and exists in a completely different context - I doubt an LLM would be successful guiding a robotic earthworm around since all it knows about earthworms is what researchers have observed and documented. The actual second-to-second experience of being an earthworm is not accessible as training data to an LLM.

Edit:

This is true almost by definition. An LLM (Large Language Model) can't have intelligence that's not expressible in language and earthworms are notoriously shy in interviews.

Thanks for reinforcing my general point that this is a stupid meaningless fruitless argument. Both mine and yours. You supplied the hypothetical at the end of my argument.