If you don't like the license, then don't accept it.

You are then restricted by copyright just like with any other creation.

If I include the source code of Windows into my product, I can't simply choose to re-license it to say public domain and give it to someone else, the license that I have from Microsoft to allow me to use their code won't let me - it provides restrictions. It's just as "viral" as the GPL.

▲

pclmulqdq 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I like the GPL. I just don't know how much you can actually enforce it.

Also, "don't use my code" is not viral. If you break the MSFT license, you pay them, which is a very well-tested path in courts. The idea of forced public disclosure does not seem to be.

▲

iso1631 an hour ago | parent [-]

How much do you pay them?

If the GPL license didn't exist, and instead you just relying on copyright, then that's an injunction. You have to stop using the code you "stole" and pay reparations.

In UK law, if you distribute copyright material in the course of a business you can be facing 10 years in prison and an unlimited fine.

Sure you can't get them to agree to the GPL, they could simply stop distributing and then turn up to their stint in prison and massive fine. In reality I suspect they would take the easy way out and comply with the license.

	▲	pclmulqdq 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You pay them an amount determined by the court or your settlement, and you also have to stop using the code. This is how everything works. Corporations can't go to prison.