| ▲ | zamadatix 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The article goes deep into these two cases deemed most relevant but really there are a wide swath of similar cases all focused around defining sharper borders than ever around what is essentially the question "exactly when does it become copyright violation" with plenty of seemingly "obvious" answers which quickly conflict with each other. I also have the feeling it will be much like Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., much of this won't really be clearly resolved until the end if the decade. I'd also not ve surprised if seemingly very different answers ended up bubbling up in the different cases, driven by the specifics of the domain. Not a lawyer, just excited to see the outcomes :). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | twoodfin 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ideally, Congress would just settle this basket of copyright concerns, as they explicitly have the power to do—and have done so repeatedly in the specific context of computers and software. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||