| ▲ | zdragnar 2 hours ago | |
For system failure, yes, but not if data retention and recovery is your primary concern. When building a device primarily used for storing personal things, I'd much prefer to save money on the motherboard and risk that failing than skimping on the drives themselves | ||
| ▲ | aynyc 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
You actually want reliable MB & RAM to ensure data doesn't get corrupted in memory first. Since you have various ways of writing data to disks that offer you resiliency. | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Eh, cheap motherboards aren't a panacea that can't hurt the rest of the hardware, I personally don't skimp on motherboards, and would much rather skimp on the drives themselves as I have redundancy and 1-2 drives failing wouldn't hurt too much. And data retention is my top priority. Motherboards have fried connected hardware before, poor grounding/ESD protections, firmware bugs together with aggressive power management, wiring weirdness and power related faults have broken people's drives before. What I've never heard about is a drive breaking something else in a system, but broken motherboards have taken friends with them more than once. | ||