Remix.run Logo
zdragnar 2 hours ago

For system failure, yes, but not if data retention and recovery is your primary concern.

When building a device primarily used for storing personal things, I'd much prefer to save money on the motherboard and risk that failing than skimping on the drives themselves

aynyc 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

You actually want reliable MB & RAM to ensure data doesn't get corrupted in memory first. Since you have various ways of writing data to disks that offer you resiliency.

embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Eh, cheap motherboards aren't a panacea that can't hurt the rest of the hardware, I personally don't skimp on motherboards, and would much rather skimp on the drives themselves as I have redundancy and 1-2 drives failing wouldn't hurt too much. And data retention is my top priority.

Motherboards have fried connected hardware before, poor grounding/ESD protections, firmware bugs together with aggressive power management, wiring weirdness and power related faults have broken people's drives before.

What I've never heard about is a drive breaking something else in a system, but broken motherboards have taken friends with them more than once.