Code of Conduct cannot stop someone from doing something.

It’s just a document.

However, in this case, the presence of the code of conduct has made it trivially easy to point out the language as wrong in a way whoever wrote this for Zig cannot refute.

It’s working exactly as it should.

▲

kelnos 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How is it working? The post is still there, referring to people as "losers" and "monkeys". Was the author of the post chastised? Have they edited the post and apologized?

	▲	KingMob 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Heh. You've rediscovered Critical Race Theory, which was a graduate-level theory about how rules/laws are systematically applied to minorities/the powerless, and not applied to the powerful/project leaders. Holding the powerful to the law is unfortunately, a separate issue to whether it's worth it to have written rules/laws in the first place. A CoC could still be better than no CoC, even if it fails to rein in abuse from the top.

▲

reactordev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Which suffice to say is not at all

▲

IshKebab 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They don't have to refute it; they have the power to ignore it.

▲

szundi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]