Interesting idea but unfortunately the given example comic makes very little sense.

It was difficult to parse even as someone who's familiar with these concepts, and I think it will hurt more than help any newbies.

▲ itronitron 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>> the given example comic makes very little sense.

I thought that was just due to it being about React.

▲ continuational 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think this kind of slop has negative value. It's unclear how much of the information in the comic is hallucinated, and the malformed code "for i = i1+|>" and nonsense text "(starts write hooks!" doesn't bode well.

	▲	vunderba 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Definitely still needs a "human in the loop." I don't know if this particular comic was cherry-picked or if it was the first one generated by Nano-Banana Pro, but either way, it's still got plenty of messy typos. `RULES OF HOORS? Updste #2: setState Starts wite hooks!`

▲ Paracompact 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Exactly my thought. Can anyone here say otherwise?

	▲	collingreen 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I didn't have any trouble with the comic but I do already know these things about how react hooks work so I'm not going in fresh. I think it's a little whimsical, perhaps too much for what info it conveys (a bullet list with the same component names would probably be equally informative), but I thought it was easy to understand and follow. I think there is -something- here; I don't need THIS comic but if it was more about the context and goals of the change then maybe that would be powerful. Especially if it was consistently done over many PRs.