| ▲ | woodruffw 8 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t have strong opinions about Zig or Codeberg, but I find the self-described status of the latter’s infrastructure concerning[1]: they’re seemingly running faulty hardware in production with limited redundancy, and are actively soliciting more hardware of unknown quality/reliability/provenance from their community. This is cool for a hobbyist project, but it doesn’t scream “stable platform for a post-GitHub world,” which is how I’ve seen Codeberg (aspirationally) described. [1]: https://blog.codeberg.org/letter-from-codeberg-onwards-and-u... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MarkMarine 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading the infra part of the post made me smile, I spent part of my week putting workloads on spot but this is the real spot market. Chaos monkey is running in prod if you are ready for it or not. Jokes aside, the technical depth it takes to make that one server run is impressive. That makes me more interested in codeberg, not less, though I’m going to keep my own mirror of the zig repo until they get some better hardware. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mzi 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It seems like they have reliability issues; if I read their status page correctly, they have incidents every few minutes. Or how should one read their all green page? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||