| ▲ | __loam 21 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Have you done any research into this or are you just assuming unions lead to bad outcomes because you've been propagandized for decades about it? > This should be happening because I’m pretty sure most PMs could be replaced by an LLM Says a lot about your understanding of these things. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pdimitar 18 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
While I too doubt that unions would be a net negative and I might even suspect interference by paid malicious actors to discourage people to unionize and thus never have power, I can't agree with your skepticism that PMs cannot be replaced by LLMs. Most PMs I've ever met had zero clue what they are doing. And no it's not only N=1 sample, same anecdote is heard from many, many other people. But sadly enough, undeniable human incompetence there is not even the biggest problem. The "we will never make more reasonable deadline" is. Most managers, not just PMs, are an objective net negative. As any ruling class always does, they get complacent and think that just putting their foot down is going to magically change reality. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||