| ▲ | throwaway2562 3 hours ago | |
What is the utility of denying it? What do you or anyone else actually get from such obvious absurdity, I wonder? If it helps - and I have doubts - does (say) a working knowledge of Galois theory require more advanced mathematical cognition than arithmetic? Would it be immoral to introduce such ghastly, hierarchical language? Etc. I see you ignored the obvious rejoinder downthread, which stated that the utility of classifying behaviours or capacities is to help you predict outcomes. How much more help do you need here? It’s not very complicated, but you prefer to showboat. | ||