| ▲ | nradov a day ago | |||||||
Did they succeed because of Erlang or in spite of Erlang? We can't draw any reliable conclusions from a single data point. Maybe a different platform would have worked even better? | ||||||||
| ▲ | HalcyonicStorm a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Erlang is uniquely suited to chat systems out of the box in a way that most other ecosystems aren't. Lightweight green threads via the BEAM vm, process scheduler so concurrent out of the box, immutable data structures, message passing as communication between processes. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | awesome_dude a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yeah - the technology used is a seperate concern to their abilities as users (developers) of that technology and the effectiveness at handling the scale. I, for example, have always said that I am more than capable of writing code in C that is several orders of magnitude SLOWER than what I could write in.. say Python. My skillset would never be used as an example of the value of C for whatever | ||||||||