| ▲ | ArcHound 5 hours ago | |
I disagree. No state "owned" by LLM changed, it only sent a request to the internet like any other. EDIT: In other words, the LLM didn't change any state it has access to. To stretch this further - clicking on search results changes the internal state of Google. Would you consider this ability of LLM to be state-changing? Where would you draw the line? | ||
| ▲ | wingmanjd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
[EDIT] I should have included the full C option: Change state or communicate externally. The ability to call `cat` and then read results would "activate" the C option in my opinion. | ||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||