| ▲ | parados a day ago | |||||||
> and my recent hyper-fixation (seems to spark up again every few years), the sinking of the Titanic. But the rest of your comment reveals nothing novel other than anyone would find after watching James Cameron's movie multiple times. I suggest you go to the original inquiries (congressional in the US, Board of trade in the UK). There is a wealth of subtle lessons there. Hint: Look at the Admiralty Manual of Seamanship that was current at that time and their recommendations when faced with an iceberg. Hint: Look at the Board of Trade (UK) experiments with the turning behaviour of the sister ship. In particular of interest is the engine layout of the Titanic and the attempt by the crew, inexperienced with the ship, to avoid the iceberg. This was critical to the outcome. Hint: Look at the behaviour of Captain Rostron. Lots of lessons there. | ||||||||
| ▲ | JohnMakin a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Thanks for your feedback, I’m well aware of the inquiries and the history there. However, this post was meant to be a simple analogy that related to the broader topic, not a deep dive into the theories of how and why the titanic sank. Thanks! | ||||||||
| ||||||||